|
This week, I quizzed the Secretary of State for the
Department of Communities and Local Government, Ruth Kelly, over the
subsidence currently affecting Egremont
caused
by abandoned historic mineworkings. I have tabled ten parliamentary
questions on the issue and am now seeking a meeting with the responsible
minister to discuss the issues facing Egremont. I know that the people of
Egremont (and Cleator) are extremely concerned by the subsidence currently
affecting the town. Like me, you want to know how widespread the problem is,
which bodies are responsible for dealing with the problem and when and by
whom these problems are going to be resolved.
Surely, funding and professional expertise must be made available by someone
at some point so that the wider community can have its anxieties removed and
the problem solved? For some time now, I have spoken with local residents
and local mine historians and geologists about the scale of the problem
(Councillor David Banks in particular continues to offer invaluable advice
and guidance) and the fact of the matter is that we cannot leave the next
major subsidence episode to chance. We deserve better, and I intend to do
everything in my power to ensure that we get all of the help that we need.
We need to map the town geologically so that we can understand what is next
likely to happen, where and when. This will require partnership from a
number of bodies and will cost significant sums, but Egremont cannot be the
only town in the country experiencing subsidence caused by historic,
abandoned mineworkings and it may be the case that a national effort is
needed to assist all of those areas experiencing these problems. I know that
the people of Egremont and the surrounding areas have displayed uncommon
patience so far and the resolution of this problem is well overdue.
My parliamentary questions will be answered soon and this will only then be
the start of the process to resolve this issue. This may be a long haul, but
we are in it together.
A New Council for Copeland?
Debating the merits of proposals to change the structure of
local government in Cumbria at Westminster this week I spelled out my
position on the proposed changes .
I will not countenance moves which lead towards the loss of
jobs in Copeland or the deterioration of those services currently provided.
Nor will I contemplate any model which facilitates an anti-nuclear agenda or
reduces the unquestionable primacy and moral legitimacy of Copeland Borough
Council and the people of Copeland in matters relating to the nuclear
industry.
It's a fact that the current model of district and county councils does not
serve us well and change is required. Essentially, councils exist to serve
the public and it is the interests of the public, not the interests of the
councils which must drive change.
So as the people who pay for all this, why not let me
know what you think? You can e-mail me at
reedjr@parliament.co.uk
or write to me at the address listed on the back page.
Remember, it's your council.
|