|
In case you missed it, the world changed irreversibly
last week with the election of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the
United States. The election
of Obama, forty years after the assassination of Martin Luther King and
Robert Kennedy, has already been described as a political change to rank
alongside the end of apartheid in South Africa and the fall of the Berlin
Wall. As someone fortunate enough to have witnessed the event first hand, it
is hard to disagree.
Much has been made of Obama’s race as the factor which explains most of all
why this election was so important and this is true for people of all races
and groups, not just African-Americans. However, Obama has not been elected
principally because of his race, but because of his ideas. As remarkable as
it may seem for America to elect an African-American President, it is no
less remarkable for America to elect a man who believes, in his own words,
in "spreading the wealth around".
Having followed these elections for two weeks now, I have been struck by the
clear similarities between the language and policies of Obama with that of
Gordon Brown and Tony Blair. On the campaign trail, on the television and
wherever else he goes, Obama uses the language of social democracy. He
believes, as Labour does, that government can be a force for good and that
the market should be regulated for the benefit of both society and the
market itself. He believes, as Labour does, that universal healthcare is a
right and that poverty can and should be eradicated. As a Labour politician,
listening to Obama has a very familiar ring to it so it’s little wonder that
so many senior Labour politicians have publicly supported his candidacy.
Exactly the same similarities can be found between the Conservatives and the
Republicans. Remember that David Cameron invited John McCain to be the
keynote speaker at the Tory conference last year so that both could wax
lyrical about ‘compassionate’ Conservatism. Both men’s response to the
international financial crisis has been deeply flawed and has exposed their
natural instincts – a dogmatic belief in the supremacy of the market above
the interests of society – and both men want to give bigger tax breaks to
the wealthiest in their respective societies at the expense of the poorest
within both America and the UK. McCain fought an extremely negative and
personal campaign against Obama and so too Cameron delights (in the absence
of much policy) in the petty name calling and personal abuse of Gordon Brown
which he instigates and encourages others to emulate. David Cameron has
shown increasingly poor judgement over recent months and his very public
support for John McCain tells us far more about his views than he would
clearly like the public to know…
The similarities are remarkable and point the way to the same divisions over
the same issues in our own next general election.
Gordon Brown has called Obama’s election, "a defining moment". Adding, "It
is up to us whether 2008 is remembered for a financial crash that engulfed
the world or for a new resilience and optimism from a generation which faced
the economic storm head on and built the fair society in its wake."
The Prime Minister’s judgment has been impeccable in recent months; here, he
is right again.
|